Sunday, May 17, 2020

Limited Use of Cell Phones - 1453 Words

Argumentative essay Mobile cell phones should be limited in certain schools Mobile phones can be an issue in certain schools. Mobile phones should be banned in elementary and middle schools. However, phones during class in high school and college should be up to the teacher, whether or not to have them. As youths get older, they become more responsible on how they use their phones. Elementary schools shouldn’t have phones period. The kids shouldn’t have a phone that young. They don’t need it for many reasons. Parents know where they are any ways. There is always an adult around. In case of an emergency, the school can contact the parents. There is also a phone in the office and every classroom. Kids that young are easily distracted†¦show more content†¦The school should let the teachers pick if students are allowed to have phones or not. Students in high school are a little more responsible. The students know what is wrong and right. Students in high school are a little more responsible. If they really need to use their phones, they will go out into the hallways. For example if they needed to call their parents or any relative, for some reason. Most students are good about not using their phones during tests. Some classes do have some days where they need to look things up and that is where the smart phones come in handy. For example, if you are taking a foreign language class and need to look it up, you have the phone to look it up. That is if the teacher is busy and you can find it in the book. If they teachers don’t say anything about phones they can’t get mad at the students. Cell phones should be very limited in high school but not as strict as middle school. For example, they should be allowed during passing period and lunch but not classes. Phones should be turned in when they are taking a test or quiz. Students are allowed to get it after everyone is done. If they have their phones out the students can take a picture of it and send it to other students as well as looking up answers. S tudents could also not pay attention to something that they need to know for college or their career path. They won’t focus on what is really important. Cell phones already take over so much of student’s lives. College is aShow MoreRelatedCell Phones Should Be Limited During Family Events875 Words   |  4 PagesI got my first cell phone, and I was excited. My mom put a limit on when I could be on my phone and I am grateful for that. Since 2000 technology and cell phone usage have increased tremendously over the 15 years. Everywhere you go you see people on their phones, and most peoples lives revolve around their cell phone. I know for me, I am on my phone constantly, and I probably would get more work and sleep if I stayed off my phone as much. The use of cell phones should be limited during family eventsRead MoreImportance Of Cell Phones In The Classroom1719 Words   |  7 PagesThe idea of cell phones in the classroom is an immensely debated topic. Researchers and professors have done research and conducted experiments to decide if having technology in the classroom is beneficial or simply a distraction. Many school’s policies on the use of technology vary depending on the type of education system. The statistics given based on whether cell phone use is permitted at school is oftentimes used to support one side of the argument. People tend to lean towards a specific sideRead MoreThe Negative Effect of Cell Phones on Society Essay961 Words   |  4 PagesA cell phone is an electronic device used for the mobile telecommunication i.e. mobile telephony, data transmission and text messaging. It is used over a cellular network of specialized base stations. It differs from cordless telephones, which offers telephony service only within a limited range i.e. within a home or an office. As the time passes it offers more and more advance features. A society is a social, economical or industrial infrastructure, made up of collection of indivi duals. AlthoughRead MoreCell Phone Coverage: More Important Than The Gadget Essay1695 Words   |  7 Pagesa rare occasion that you do not see a cell phone when walking down the street. These days everyone has a cell phone and if you do not, then the public looks at you in shock. The cell phone has upgraded communication from the typical party line to the wonders of wireless freedom. Cell phone providers entice people with their hands-free, unlimited text and voice, 4G, mp3, Internet, and video capabilities. Children, as young as kindergarten age, have a cell phone and the older retirement generation isRead MoreDriving With Cell Phone Ban Essays1043 Words   |  5 PagesIt’s was a dark night. The traffic was heavy; it was raining, and visibility was limited. There was an accident on the Interstate and three young people were killed. During the investigation it is revealed that one of the drivers was using a cell phone and failed to see the brake lightss of the car in front of them that had swerved to avoid hitting a deer. Though our instinct is to do what we can to prevent such tragedies in the future; we cannot control the weather. We can restrict driving at nightRead MoreTechnology Has Changed The Way People Communicate983 Words   |  4 PagesOver the years, technology has changed the way people communicate. Originally the telephone replaced the telegraph. Today cell phones, email and the Internet top the list of preferred communication methods in society. As more businesses and educational institutions use technology to communicate, society seems to have accepted, if not embraced, the increased role technology now plays in daily lives. Age has an impact on an individual s preferred method of communication. Communication today is entirelyRead MoreMoblie Phone Technology and The Social Impact Thereof Essay1263 Words   |  6 PagesINTRODUCTION Mobile phone technology is a technology that a vast majority of us would be familiar with, allowing one to call from almost anywhere, anytime as long as they connected a network. Mobile phones revolutionised the world of personal communication, because of this it is important that the impacts that the technology has had on the community. This essay will trace, in brief, the history of mobile phone technology along with an examination of the social impacts that this technology hasRead MoreCell Phones And The United States971 Words   |  4 PagesCell phones originated in the United States in 1946, as a signal to an unused channel. Then, the calls got connected to an operator, which he or she would forward the call to the other party. While having a conversation, you were only allowed to talk to one person at a time. Adrian Lee (www.express.co.uk) says, â€Å"The weight of the phone used to make that call was about the same as a bag of sugar (2lb). The brick–like battery requi red, which allowed a talk time of just 30 minutes and took 10 hoursRead MoreImpact of Cell Phones1262 Words   |  6 Pagesof cellular phones has become ubiquitous in our American society, illustrating the growing effects of technology on our advancing society. It is nearly impossible to imagine entering any public setting without encountering at least one person using a cell phone because this has become a part of normal, everyday life. The benefits to mobile communication are numerous; however, many would argue that the detriments are abundant as well. An impartial view of the effects of cell phone use would stillRead MoreEffects of Mass Media633 Words   |  3 Pages|television, Internet, social media, newspaper, and cell phones. Radios were less expensive| |century? |than telephones and had the ability of allowing huge numbers of people to listen to the | | |same event at the same time. Radio use to be transmitted through am and fm. Television | | |during the early decades only had limited numbers of channels. By 2004, cable providers | |

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Allende and Peter Winns Weavers of Revolution Essay

Allende and Peter Winns Weavers of Revolution In Peter Winns Weavers of Revolution, a factory in Santiago, Chile fights for their independence against the Chilean government of the 1970s. While this rebellion is going on, presidential elections are taking place and Salvador Allende is the presidential candidate which represents the common people. The relation between Allende and the people he represents is a unique one because at first this class, the working class, helps and supports Allende to become president, but then both parties realize their different plans for the future and the working class actually contributes to the downfall of Allendes presidency. At first, the working class heavily supported Allendes campaign. A†¦show more content†¦Allende based his campaign around the unfairness of Chiles society to the working class, and the Yarur factory gave him the support he needed to win the election. Once Allende becomes elected, the two revolutions which were supposed to compliment each other actually start to work against each other. The first type of revolution is the revolution from below, which is characteristic of the workers in the Yarur rebelling against the Chilean government. The other type is the revolution from above, this was the revolution common of the higher class like Allende working towards workers rights. At first, the workers think that their revolution from below was only helping Allendes revolution from above. The workers did things like form unions for the first time, or were even so bold to strike against the mill in order to gain complete control over it. Strikes had happened before which were about things like wages or unions, but this was different for the fact that they wanted total control of the mill. Allende was forced to give the workers the power to control the mill. This is just one of the examples of how the revolution from below sometimes coincided with or complemented, but increasingly diverged from, the legalistic and modulated revolution from above (141). For the most part in fact, the strategies of Allende were disrupted by the revolution from below because of their need for extremeShow MoreRelatedWeavers of Revolution Essay912 Words   |  4 PagesGreg Parkhurst 11/2/06 Allende and the Weavers of Revolution In Peter Winns Weavers of Revolution, a factory in Santiago, Chile fights for their independence against the Chilean government of the 1970s. While this rebellion is going on, presidential elections are taking place and Salvador Allende is the presidential candidate which represents the common people. The relation between Allende and the people he represents is a unique one because at first this class, the working class, helps

Matt Ridley and Genetic Engineering Essay Example For Students

Matt Ridley and Genetic Engineering Essay PHIL 102 A Homework 2In his article title The New Eugenics, addressing the regulation of genetic engineering, Matt Ridley presents three arguments against restrictive policies, and then responds to what he deems to be the fallacy of each. Although his final conclusion is one I agree with, his arguments seem shallow, vague, and do not do a very good job supporting his opinion. One objection to the genetic engineering of humans that Ridley chooses to point out is the implication that the cost of the procedure would create a greater class barrier between those who could afford it and those that could not. The richest members of society would have access to the best genetic enhancements, while those who cant afford it would have to leave things to chance. Broadening the gap between social classes this way can only lead to more discrimination.Ridley argues that this is not the case. He responds by stating that genetic engineering would need to become commonplace before this would even be an issue, and that even if it were available, the procedure, which would involve in vitro fertilization, would be painful, exhausting and less desirable to most. He assumes that genetic engineering would attract only a very small clientele. If his response that problems will arise only if the treatment becomes widely available, then I would argue that Ridley has made no real argument at all. Im sure there was a time when people thought plastic surgery was a ridiculous idea. Why would anyone want to go through the pain and discomfort experienced after having a face-lift or breast implants? And yet million of women, especially young American women, go through some kind of cosmetically enhancing procedure every year. It is a practice that has become so widely accepted in our beauty and youth obsessed society, that we glamorize it by having a show called Extreme Makeover, where lucky contestants get to be completely transformed through plastic surgery. In a society where it is suggested that plastic surgery is a healthy way to deal with your self-image problems, genetic enhancement will surely become the next fad amongst the richest members of society in their search for physical perfection and the fountain of youth. The notion becomes a little more intimidating if you consider other attributes, like intelligence, that can be affected by genetic engineering. Our society is competitive, and if a procedure is available that could possibly create a genetically superior human being, I think it would be only natural that those who can afford such treatment will jump at the chance to use it. A its popularity rises, the rift between genetically enhanced beings and naturally birthed beings will grow. People who had no access to the treatment will be looked down upon, especially if they have any physical or mental deficiency that could be seen as avoidable. This asks the question of whether or not the government should allow this treatment to be available at all, thus giving no member of society an unnatural advantage. Ridley argues that it is not a decision our government should make, and on this point I have to agree. It is my belief that the government has no business regulating abortion, and as some abortion procedures can be seen as a means of genetic selection, I must concur that the government has no business regulating genetic enhancement. As Ridley says, nobody should be forced to engineer her childrens genes-but, by implication, neither should anyone be forced not to. From this perspective, I can see how one would argue against federal regulation. It would next to impossible to draw the line between procedures that are desired, but probably not necessary for the child to have a normal life, and those that will actually save the life of the child.